Higman's theorem
WebAug 5, 2008 · Higman spent the year 1960-61 in Chicago at a time when there was an explosion of interest in finite simple groups, following Thompson's thesis which had seen an almost unimaginable extension of the Hall-Higman methods; it was during that year that the Odd Order Theorem was proved. Higman realised that this represented the future of the … Webthe Higman–Haines sets in terms of nondeterministic finite automata. c 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V. Keywords: Finite automata; Higman’s theorem; Well-partial order; Descriptional complexity; Non-recursive trade-offs 1. Introduction A not so well-known theorem in formal language theory is that of Higman [6, Theorem 4.4], which reads as ...
Higman's theorem
Did you know?
WebOct 1, 1990 · The Nagata-Higman theorem for the nilpotency of nil algebras of bounded … WebThe following theorem was essentially proved by Higman [1] using well quasi-order theory. …
WebAbstract. The Nagata-Higman theorem for the nilpotency of nil algebras of bounded index was proved in 1953 by Nagata [Nal] over a field of characteristic 0 and then in 1956 by Higman [Hg] in the general setup. Much later it was discovered that this theorem was first established in 1943 by Dubnov and Ivanov [DI] but their paper was overlooked by ... WebHigman essentially showed that if Ais any language then SUBSEQ(A) is regular, where …
WebFeb 12, 2016 · By Higman's lemma, the subword order on A ∗ is a well-quasi-order. Therefore, for each language L, the set F of minimal words of L (for the subword ordering) is a finite set F and ш ш L ш A ∗ = F ш A ∗. It is now easy to show that ш F ш A ∗ is a regular language. In a vein similar to Pin's answer. WebMay 5, 2016 · In term rewriting theory, Higman’s Lemma and its generalization to trees, …
WebJan 13, 2024 · The theorem applies to (non-elementary) free products as they act …
WebGraham Higman, 1987 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 1.1. The main steps of Higman’s … eagle life phone numberWebA CENTRALISER ANALOGUE TO THE FARAHAT-HIGMAN ALGEBRA 3 effort was made for all the results of FHm established in this paper to work in the integral setting, that is over the ring R. This keeps the algebra FHm open as a potential tool to analyse the modular representation theroy of the centraliser algebras Zn,m, which is an active area of research … eagle life index annuityWebTheorem 1 (Higman [1]). SUBSEQ(L) is regular for any L ⊆Σ∗. Clearly, SUBSEQ(SUBSEQ(L)) = SUBSEQ(L) for any L, since is transitive. We’ll say that L is -closed if L = SUBSEQ(L). So Theorem 1 is equivalent to the statement that a language L is regular if L is -closed. The remainder of this note is to prove Theorem 1. eagle life expectancyWebHALL-HIGMAN TYPE THEOREMS. IV T. R. BERGER1 Abstract. Hall and Higman's Theorem B is proved by con-structing the representation in the group algebra. This proof is independent of the field characteristic, except in one case. Let R be an extra special r group. Suppose C_Aut(/?) is cyclic, ir-reducible faithful on R¡Z(R), and trivial on Z(R). eagle life insurance company complaintsWebThis involves considering type-theoretic formulations of bar induction, fan theorem, Ramsey theorem, and Higman 's lemma. The proof was formalized in Martin-Lof's type theory without universes, and edited and checked in the proof editor ALF. 1 Introduction Higman's lemma is a significant result in combinatorics. It was discovered by Higman ... csk balance sheetWebApr 1, 1975 · It was first studied thoroughly in Theorem B of Hall and Higman (10). In this sequence of papers we look at the basic configurations arising out of Theorem B. In Hall-Higman Type Theorems. eagle liftgate cablesWebWe believe that Theorem 1.2 can in principle be extended to n 18 by building upon our approach, and parallelizing the computation (see x7.6). It is unlikely however, that this would lead to a disproof of Higman’s Conjecture 1.1 without a new approach. Curiously, this brings the status of Higman’s conjecture in line with that of Higman’s eagle lifetime roofing